12 Best Water Filters


Selection Guide

First, con­sumers should study the com­po­si­tion of the water flow­ing from the tap.


Types of pol­lu­tion. Depend­ing on the region, the moder­ni­ty of the treat­ment plant, the depth of the well or well, the qual­i­ty of water can vary great­ly. It may con­tain a whole bunch of impu­ri­ties, the con­cen­tra­tion of which exceeds the per­mis­si­ble lim­its. Most often in the water are present:

  1. mechan­i­cal par­ti­cles (grains of sand, silt, rust):
  2. inor­gan­ic com­pounds (salts of iron, heavy met­als, chlo­rine);
  3. organ­ic sub­stances (petro­le­um prod­ucts, her­bi­cides, pes­ti­cides);
  4. microor­gan­isms (bac­te­ria, virus­es, fun­gi).

Before buy­ing a fil­ter, you should give water to the lab­o­ra­to­ry for a full study.


Clean­ing meth­ods. Each type of pol­lu­tion requires a spe­cial fil­tra­tion tech­nol­o­gy. Most often, sev­er­al meth­ods of water purifi­ca­tion are used.

  1. At the first stage, mechan­i­cal impu­ri­ties are sep­a­rat­ed, in many cas­es a “mud fil­ter” (mesh fil­ter) installed in the water main is suf­fi­cient. Purifi­ca­tion sys­tems use porous polypropy­lene fil­ters.
  2. With the help of absorbents (acti­vat­ed car­bon) it is pos­si­ble to retain a wide range of com­pounds dis­solved in water. After pass­ing through such a fil­ter, the taste of water improves, the smell and col­or are elim­i­nat­ed. But the pores quick­ly become clogged, and the fil­ter becomes a source of pol­lu­tion.
  3. The prin­ci­ple of oper­a­tion of ion-exchange resins is the sub­sti­tu­tion reac­tion. Cal­ci­um and mag­ne­sium salts pen­e­trate the fil­ter, which has a pos­i­tive effect on the soft­ness of the water. But the ser­vice life of such sys­tems is short.
  4. The small­est sieve resem­ble mem­brane fil­ter ele­ments. They puri­fy water at the mol­e­c­u­lar lev­el. Such sys­tems are eco­nom­i­cal and effi­cient in oper­a­tion.
  5. The most advanced today is the prin­ci­ple of reverse osmo­sis. Such fil­ters pro­vide the high­est lev­el of purifi­ca­tion, but replace­able mod­ules of this type are expen­sive. The dis­ad­van­tages include a small through­put.


Addi­tion­al options. Many man­u­fac­tur­ers do not stop at water purifi­ca­tion from impu­ri­ties. They install mod­ules that make water tasty and healthy.

  1. Min­er­al­iza­tion is designed to sat­u­rate almost dis­tilled water with use­ful salts or min­er­als (sil­i­con). A small con­cen­tra­tion of these sub­stances makes the water tasty.
  2. Alka­liz­ing water is meant to make it health­i­er. Accord­ing to many doc­tors, the human body becomes acidic over time, so slight­ly alka­line water should be con­sumed.
  3. A con­tro­ver­sial (in terms of ben­e­fits for the human body) option is the sat­u­ra­tion of water with sil­ver ions. Such water real­ly reli­ably kills path­o­gen­ic microflo­ra. But in the same way, sil­ver ions can destroy ben­e­fi­cial microor­gan­isms in the human body.

Our review includes 12 of the best water fil­ters. These mod­els suc­cess­ful­ly puri­fy water in the hous­es and apart­ments of Rus­sians, as evi­denced by the pos­i­tive feed­back from the own­ers.

12 Best Water Filters

The best under sink water filters

The instal­la­tion of mod­ules under the sink allows you to organ­i­cal­ly fit the water fil­tra­tion sys­tem into the kitchen inte­ri­or. Replace­able car­tridges are hid­den from human eyes, and you can deter­mine the pres­ence of fil­tered water by an addi­tion­al small tap. Today, the dom­i­nant posi­tions are occu­pied by high­ly effi­cient reverse osmo­sis sys­tems. The experts liked the per­for­mance prop­er­ties of sev­er­al mod­els.

Aquaphor DWM-101S Morion

Rat­ing: 5.0


Aquaphor DWM-101S Morion

The most pop­u­lar fil­ter under the sink, judg­ing by the large num­ber of reviews, is the Russ­ian devel­op­ment Aquaphor DWM-101S Mori­on. Reverse osmo­sis formed the basis of fil­tra­tion. It allows you to get drink­ing water, even if there are mechan­i­cal impu­ri­ties, bac­te­ria or tox­ic com­pounds in the water sup­ply. Dur­ing the entire life of the mem­brane, the fil­ter elim­i­nates scale. Experts appre­ci­at­ed the com­pact­ness of the mod­el, it is half the size of its class­mates. This is the mer­it of the devel­op­ers who man­aged to cre­ate a unique design. The fil­ter remains oper­a­tional even at low line pres­sure. Thanks to eco­nom­i­cal fil­tra­tion, it will be more prof­itable for home­own­ers to change car­tridges than to buy bot­tled water. The Aquaphor DWM-101S Mori­on sys­tem becomes the win­ner of our review.

Based on the reviews in Runet, we can con­clude that the fil­ter puri­fies water effi­cient­ly and eco­nom­i­cal­ly, has a com­pact size. But they con­sid­er the cost of replace­able mod­ules to be rather high.

Advantages

  • high degree of purifi­ca­tion;
  • com­pact dimen­sions;
  • prof­itabil­i­ty;
  • low pres­sure fil­tra­tion.

Flaws

  • high cost of replace­ment mod­ules.

SENDO Aqua A12

Rat­ing: 4.9


SENDO Aqua A12

The SENDO Aqua A12 fil­ter scored a lot of pos­i­tive reviews in RuNet. The oper­a­tion of the sys­tem is based on reverse osmo­sis, water purifi­ca­tion occurs at a rate of 0.184 liters per minute. The experts liked the 4‑stage clean­ing, which retains up to 99% of salts, microor­gan­isms and bac­te­ria. The fil­ter is designed for water pipes with a pres­sure of 2 atm. The sup­ply of drink­ing water is stored in a 12-liter stor­age tank. A min­er­al­iz­er car­tridge is installed in the sys­tem, after pass­ing through it, the water becomes tasti­er due to sat­u­ra­tion with microele­ments of nat­ur­al ori­gin. Instal­la­tion of the device takes sev­er­al min­utes, and replace­able mod­ules are also quick­ly changed. The SENDO Aqua A12 fil­ter ris­es to the sil­ver step of the podi­um.

Russ­ian users liked the ease of instal­la­tion, rich equip­ment, styl­ish design, and the taste of water. The down­sides are the incom­pre­hen­si­ble assem­bly instruc­tions.

Advantages

  • mul­ti-stage clean­ing;
  • min­er­al­iza­tion;
  • sim­ple instal­la­tion;
  • styl­ish design.

Flaws

  • incom­pre­hen­si­ble assem­bly instruc­tions.

Prio New Water Start Osmos OU380

Rat­ing: 4.8


Prio New Water Start Osmos OU380

There are many fans among Russ­ian home­own­ers at the Prio Novaya Voda Start Osmos OU380 fil­ter. In this mod­el, Russ­ian devel­op­ers have intro­duced a 5‑stage clean­ing tech­nol­o­gy. Despite the large num­ber of fil­ter ele­ments, the clean­ing rate reach­es 0.125 l/min. The man­u­fac­tur­er equipped the device with a 12-liter tank for stor­ing clean water. Experts appre­ci­at­ed the strength of the design, built-in dampers become an impor­tant ele­ment in pro­tect­ing the fil­ter from water ham­mer. The mod­el can­not boast of a rich set of addi­tion­al fea­tures, but it is sold in stores at an afford­able price. The Prio sys­tem New Water Start Osmos OU380 becomes the bronze medal­ist of our review.

Judg­ing by the reviews, domes­tic con­sumers have no com­plaints about the qual­i­ty of fil­tra­tion. They are sat­is­fied with the unpre­ten­tious­ness of the fil­ter, sim­plic­i­ty of design and ade­quate price. Of the minus­es, prob­lem­at­ic assem­bly is not­ed.

Advantages

  • 5‑step clean­ing;
  • good per­for­mance;
  • afford­able price;
  • strength and reli­a­bil­i­ty.

Flaws

  • prob­lem­at­ic build.

BARRIER EXPERT Slim Rigidity

Rat­ing: 4.7


BARRIER EXPERT Slim Rigidity

At the low­est price, you can pur­chase a fil­ter for wash­ing BARRIER EXPERT Slim Rigid­i­ty in the Russ­ian dis­tri­b­u­tion net­work. The mod­el also claims to be the most com­pact water purifi­ca­tion sys­tem. The depth of the device is only 8 cm. Accord­ing to experts, the mod­el is good in that it can be inde­pen­dent­ly ser­viced even by inex­pe­ri­enced house­wives. The man­u­fac­tur­er applied a 3‑stage fil­tra­tion scheme, which effec­tive­ly retains mechan­i­cal impu­ri­ties, dis­solved iron, and chlo­rine-con­tain­ing com­pounds. The unit effec­tive­ly elim­i­nates hard­ness by soft­en­ing tap water. The asset of the prod­uct should include high per­for­mance. In a minute, the sys­tem allows you to get 2 liters of high-qual­i­ty water. The war­ran­ty peri­od of the BARRIER EXPERT Slim Hard­ness fil­ter is 5 years.

Russ­ian home­own­ers rave about quick instal­la­tion, good water pres­sure, easy car­tridge replace­ment and com­pact­ness. But with very dirty tap water, the sys­tem copes worse.

Advantages

  • low price;
  • com­pact­ness;
  • high per­for­mance;
  • easy car­tridge replace­ment.

Flaws

  • does not com­plete­ly clean very dirty water.

The best water filters system next to the sink

With sim­ple con­nec­tion and easy main­te­nance, poten­tial buy­ers are attract­ed by fil­ters that are installed next to the sink. The sys­tem is mount­ed to a reg­u­lar mix­er, fil­tered water will flow from the cold water tap. The fol­low­ing mod­els have proven them­selves well among domes­tic users.

Atoll A‑550 box STD (Sailboat) with reverse osmosis

Rat­ing: 5.0


Atoll A-550 box STD (Sailboat) with reverse osmosis

The Atoll A‑550 box STD (Sail­boat) fil­ter stands out from com­peti­tors with the max­i­mum puri­ty of water (99.9%). The sys­tem works on the basis of reverse osmo­sis, its capac­i­ty is 120 l/day. The tech­no­log­i­cal scheme pro­vides for the pas­sage of 5 steps. Tap water pass­es through a semi-per­me­able mem­brane, it only allows water mol­e­cules and oxy­gen to pass through. The mod­el is equipped with a stor­age tank, it stores a sup­ply of drink­ing water with a vol­ume of 12 liters. The experts drew atten­tion to the post-fil­ter made of acti­vat­ed car­bon. It is used in cas­es where the sys­tem has not been work­ing for some time. The post-fil­ter elim­i­nates unpleas­ant odors and tastes. The man­u­fac­tur­er gives a 5‑year war­ran­ty on its prod­uct, which indi­cates the high qual­i­ty of work­man­ship. The mod­el leads the podi­um in its cat­e­go­ry.

In the reviews, domes­tic con­sumers praise the Atoll A‑550 box STD (Sail­boat) sys­tem for thought­ful con­nec­tion, good equip­ment, and high-qual­i­ty water purifi­ca­tion. The down­side is the high cost.

Advantages

  • 5‑step clean­ing;
  • com­pact dimen­sions;
  • thought­ful con­nec­tion;
  • 5 year war­ran­ty.

Prio New Water TO300

Rat­ing: 4.9


Prio New Water TO300

The Russ­ian water fil­ter Prio Novaya Voda TO300 finds wide appli­ca­tion. The device is used to obtain drink­ing water, as well as to fill aquar­i­ums. The man­u­fac­tur­er man­aged to find a good bal­ance of per­for­mance (0.25 l / min) and clean­ing qual­i­ty. The reverse osmo­sis sys­tem includes 3 stages of fil­tra­tion. Experts appre­ci­at­ed the Japan­ese Toray mem­brane, which puri­fies water at the mol­e­c­u­lar lev­el. The devel­op­ers have pro­vid­ed the pos­si­bil­i­ty of upgrad­ing their sys­tem. For exam­ple, you can install high­er capac­i­ty car­tridges, com­plete the fil­ter with a stor­age tank, add a car­bon post-fil­ter or a min­er­al­iz­er to the process chain. The resource of the mod­ule reach­es 6000 liters. The mod­el wins sil­ver in our review.

Most of the reviews in RuNet are pos­i­tive. Users are sat­is­fied with the qual­i­ty of puri­fied water, good man­u­fac­tur­ing, com­pact­ness and afford­able price. Some own­ers con­sid­er the diam­e­ter of poly­eth­yl­ene tubes to be too small, which will be dif­fi­cult to clean.

Advantages

  • high-qual­i­ty fil­tra­tion;
  • the pos­si­bil­i­ty of mod­ern­iza­tion;
  • com­pact­ness;
  • afford­able price.

Flaws

  • small sec­tion of poly­eth­yl­ene pipes.

Geyser 1UZH Euro

Rat­ing: 4.8


Geyser 1UZH Euro

The most attrac­tive pur­chase in terms of cost is the Geyser 1UZh Euro fil­ter. Russ­ian devel­op­ers man­aged to cre­ate not only a cheap, but also a pro­duc­tive device. In just 1 minute, it puri­fies up to 1.5 liters of water. At the same time, the resource of the sys­tem reach­es 7000 liters. A sophis­ti­cat­ed faucet looks beau­ti­ful, which is easy to care for. The experts ana­lyzed the com­po­si­tion of puri­fied water and were pleas­ant­ly sur­prised. Hard­ness was reduced to an accept­able con­cen­tra­tion, nitrites and nitrates, as well as chlo­rine, were com­plete­ly removed. The main fil­ter ele­ment of the sys­tem is the Aragon 2 car­tridge; the car­bon insert is designed to remove odors and tastes. The device can be used to puri­fy water with tem­per­a­tures up to +40ºС. The asset of the prod­uct should include the pres­ence of regen­er­a­tion of com­po­nents. Geyser 1UZH Euro takes an hon­or­able third place on the podi­um.

Users con­sid­er the Russ­ian devel­op­ment easy to use and con­nect. They are sat­is­fied with the fil­tra­tion qual­i­ty, design and through­put. Of the minus­es, a plas­tic adapter is not­ed, on which the thread some­times breaks.

Advantages

  • low price;
  • high per­for­mance;
  • high-qual­i­ty fil­tra­tion;
  • sim­ple con­nec­tion and oper­a­tion.

Flaws

  • unre­li­able thread on the plas­tic adapter.

The best water filter jugs

Small vol­umes of drink­ing water can be obtained in a fil­ter jug. This is the sim­plest and most bud­get option, not with­out some draw­backs. The fol­low­ing mod­els effec­tive­ly puri­fy tap water.

Aquaphor Provence A5

Rat­ing: 5.0


Aquaphor Provence A5

The undis­put­ed leader in terms of the num­ber of reviews in RuNet was the fil­ter jug ​​Aquaphor Provence A5. And most of them are pos­i­tive. Experts attribute the pop­u­lar­i­ty of the mod­el to an afford­able price, deep purifi­ca­tion of water from impu­ri­ties, and the opti­mal vol­ume of a jug (4.2 liters). The fil­ter hous­ing is made of unbreak­able plas­tic, which has a long ser­vice life. The role of the fil­ter ele­ment is played by the Aquaphor A5 replace­able mod­ule. It retains not only mechan­i­cal impu­ri­ties, but also col­loidal iron, salts of heavy met­als, active chlo­rine and var­i­ous organ­ic com­pounds. The resource of a car­tridge makes 350 l, at each fill­ing of a jug the mechan­i­cal counter works. The mod­el heads the prize podi­um in its nom­i­na­tion.

After ana­lyz­ing the numer­ous reviews of Russ­ian con­sumers, we can high­light sev­er­al advan­tages of the Aquaphor Provence A5 fil­ter. This is a styl­ish design, high-qual­i­ty fil­tra­tion, large vol­ume. By cons, they include a slow drain of fil­tered water.

Advantages

  • deep water purifi­ca­tion;
  • durable con­struc­tion;
  • capa­cious jug;
  • demo­c­ra­t­ic price.

Flaws

  • puri­fied water is slow­ly drained.

BARRIER Grand NEO 4.2 l

Rat­ing: 4.9


BARRIER Grand NEO 4.2 l

A lot of Russ­ian con­sumers use the BARRIER Grand NEO 4.2 l fil­ter-jug in every­day life. Accord­ing to experts, the mod­el imme­di­ate­ly attracts atten­tion with a beau­ti­ful appear­ance. And this is not sur­pris­ing, because the Euro­pean stu­dio was engaged in the design of dish­es. For the man­u­fac­ture of the jug, the man­u­fac­tur­er used high-qual­i­ty food-grade plas­tic from BASF. A unique fun­nel pro­vides a reli­able bar­ri­er to dust and untreat­ed water. The fil­ter ele­ment retains rust, sand, chlo­rine-con­tain­ing sub­stances, bac­te­ria. At the same time, fil­tered water becomes soft, and scale does not form in teapots for a long time. The vol­ume of the jug is 4 l, the fil­tra­tion rate reach­es 0.3 l/min. The mod­el takes sec­ond place in its cat­e­go­ry.

In the reviews, users praise the BARRIER Grand NEO 4.2 L fil­ter for its styl­ish design, capa­cious jug, and high-qual­i­ty fil­tra­tion. The dis­ad­van­tages are expen­sive car­tridges and frag­ile plas­tic.

Advantages

  • Beau­ti­ful design;
  • high-qual­i­ty fil­tra­tion;
  • capa­cious jug;
  • good per­for­mance.

Flaws

  • car­tridges are expen­sive;
  • brit­tle plas­tic.

BRITA Marella XL Memo MX+ 3.5 l

Rat­ing: 4.8


BRITA Marella XL Memo MX+ 3.5 l

The Ger­man devel­op­ment of BRITA Marel­la XL Memo MX + 3.5 l clos­es the top three fil­ter-jugs. The mod­el los­es to the review lead­ers in such an impor­tant com­po­nent as cost. The jug has a small­er vol­ume for stor­ing puri­fied water. The resource of a replace­able car­tridge is lim­it­ed to 300 liters. But experts have found sev­er­al impor­tant advan­tages of this prod­uct. First of all, they note a capa­cious fun­nel (2 l), from which untreat­ed water does not enter the fil­tered one even when tilt­ed (dur­ing pour­ing into a ket­tle or pan). The sec­ond advan­tage of the Ger­man devel­op­ment is the pres­ence of an elec­tron­ic counter. The fil­ter ele­ment effec­tive­ly retains sand and rust, alu­minum and mer­cury com­pounds. In addi­tion, the mod­ule pre­vents the devel­op­ment of microor­gan­isms, extracts chlo­rine, oil prod­ucts, pes­ti­cides and her­bi­cides from water. After boil­ing, scale does not form in the dish­es.

Domes­tic con­sumers speak flat­ter­ing­ly about the beau­ti­ful design, fast fil­tra­tion, con­ve­nient fun­nel design. Of the minus­es, they note the high cost and expen­sive car­tridges.

Advantages

  • Beau­ti­ful design;
  • high-qual­i­ty fil­tra­tion;
  • elec­tron­ic counter;
  • con­ve­nience in oper­a­tion.

Flaws

  • the high cost of the fil­ter jug ​​and car­tridge.

The best desktop water filter dispensers

Bench­top dis­pensers are a good alter­na­tive to fil­ter jugs and plumb­ing sys­tems. They are able to puri­fy a suf­fi­cient­ly large vol­ume of water, giv­ing it use­ful prop­er­ties. Car­tridges are designed for a decent resource of work. Two inter­est­ing mod­els attract­ed the atten­tion of experts.

Keosan KS-971

Rat­ing: 5.0


Keosan KS-971

The water fil­ters of the Kore­an com­pa­ny Keosan have proven them­selves well in the Russ­ian mar­ket. Many users trust this brand, because some mod­els have been with them for more than 10 years. The desk­top fil­ter dis­penser KS-971 is pop­u­lar with con­sumers. It is made of a trans­par­ent com­pound body. Pure water accu­mu­lates in the low­er tank with a vol­ume of 8 liters, and tap water is poured into the upper com­part­ment (4 liters). Fil­tra­tion occurs in accor­dance with the law of nat­ur­al grav­i­ty. Silt, sand, rust, free chlo­rine, organ­ic and inor­gan­ic sub­stances are retained in the car­tridge. A high degree of purifi­ca­tion, accord­ing to experts, is achieved through 5‑stage fil­tra­tion. At the last stage, min­er­al­iza­tion is car­ried out, the water becomes tasty and healthy. The Keosan KS-971 fil­ter dis­penser ris­es to the top step of the podi­um in its cat­e­go­ry.

Domes­tic con­sumers in the reviews report that the Kore­an fil­ter cleans water well, removes unpleas­ant odors and tastes, and the ceram­ic fil­ter is easy to care for. Some users did not like the tap, which has to be held all the time when drain­ing water.

Advantages

  • high-qual­i­ty fil­tra­tion;
  • sim­ple care;
  • Beau­ti­ful design;
  • large stor­age capac­i­ty.

Flaws

  • incon­ve­nient drain valve.

Coolmart Neos Redox

Rat­ing: 4.9


Coolmart Neos Redox

Reg­u­lar tap water acquires many use­ful prop­er­ties after pass­ing through the South Kore­an Cool­mart Neos Redox fil­ter. The man­u­fac­tur­er calls his prod­uct a hydro­gen alka­line water puri­fi­er. One of the fil­ter ele­ments is the nat­ur­al min­er­al zeo­lite, which traps many organ­ic and inor­gan­ic com­pounds. To soft­en the water, the devel­op­ers used an ion exchange resin. The pres­ence of corals in the car­tridge has a pos­i­tive effect on the bio­log­i­cal prop­er­ties of water, mak­ing the pH of the water alka­line. In addi­tion, bac­te­ria and virus­es are retained in the fil­ter, the con­cen­tra­tion of use­ful sil­i­con in the water increas­es. It is not sur­pris­ing that with such a com­plex improve­ment of water, the cost of a fil­ter-dis­penser looks quite high.

So far, domes­tic con­sumers say lit­tle about the improve­ment of the body after drink­ing fil­tered water. They liked the Kore­an devel­op­ment for sim­ple instal­la­tion and main­te­nance, com­pact­ness and light­ness, long car­tridge life and 5‑stage clean­ing. But they con­sid­er the cost of a replace­able mod­ule to be too high.

Advantages

  • effec­tive purifi­ca­tion from impu­ri­ties;
  • alka­liza­tion of water;
  • sat­u­ra­tion with sil­i­con ions;
  • sim­ple ser­vice.

Flaws

  • high cost of the fil­ter-dis­penser and replace­able car­tridge.


Rate the article

Total votes: 0rat­ing: 0

Atten­tion! This rat­ing is sub­jec­tive, is not an adver­tise­ment and does not serve as a pur­chase guide. Before buy­ing, you need to con­sult with a spe­cial­ist.

[ad_2]


Опубликовано

в

от

Метки:

Комментарии

Добавить комментарий